317 results for 'cat:"Sex Offender" AND cat:"Child Victims"'.
J. Boomgaarden finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant of sexual abuse and other sex crimes against a minor. Defendant claims there was not enough evidence entered on the record to convict him, but the state brought forward witnesses and other exhibits that all supported a jury being able to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that he acted knowingly and with intent. Affirmed.
Court: Wyoming Supreme Court, Judge: Boomgaarden, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: S-23-0268, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Hudson finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for child sexual abuse and rape, sentencing him to 25 years in prison. Nothing in defendant's confession video suggests coercion or involuntariness, and he fails to show the court's decision to allow it into evidence was erroneous. All evidence supports the conviction and nothing in the record suggests the judge considered extraneous allegation when sentencing. Affirmed.
Court: Oklahoma Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Hudson , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: F-2022-620, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. St. Eve finds that the lower court properly convicted singer R. Kelly of sexually abusing underage girls, and of child pornography for videotaping his sex acts with his victims. Under current law, there is no statute of limitations for sex crimes against children. Although R. Kelly's abuse of his victims took place in the 1990s and 2000s, he is not entitled to the application of an earlier version of the statute with a shorter limitations period. The PROTECT Act of 2003 unambiguously applies retroactively to R. Kelly's crimes. Affirmed.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: St. Eve, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 23-1449, Categories: Criminal Procedure, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Dillard finds that the trial court properly convicted defendant of child molestation, aggravated sexual battery, rape, incest, sexual exploitation of children, influencing a witness and other related offenses. The trial court correctly denied defendant's motion for a new trial. Defendant's trial counsel was not deficient for failing to object when defendant's handwritten notes to the victim were allowed to go out with the jury during deliberations. The notes were original documentary evidence, therefore any continuing witness objection put forth by defendant's counsel would have been overruled. Affirmed.
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals, Judge: Dillard, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: A24A0533, Categories: Ineffective Assistance, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Kelly finds that the trial court properly convicted defendant, the owner of a group home, of indecency with a child. Defendant argues that it was not her who took advantage of the 5-year-old victim, but she who was the victim. Reviewing the evidence, the trial court used its common sense to conclude that it was defendant, an adult woman, who caused the child to touch her sexual organs. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Kelly, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00697-CR, Categories: sex Offender, child Victims
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Dowd finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant of rape of a 17-year-old victim, and sentenced him to seven years in prison. The court did not err by allowing the victim to testify she felt intimidated at her deposition after defendant impeached her with her deposition testimony. Further, the prosecutor was permitted to highlight the age difference between defendant and the victim during closing arguments. Affirmed.
Court: Missouri Court Of Appeals, Judge: Dowd, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: ED111691, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Pirtle finds the trial court properly dismissed defendant's petition for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The 9-year-old victim reported defendant had sexually abused her when she was 3 or 4 years old, saying her mother made her available to defendant in exchange for drugs. Though information shared by the victim over several forensic interviews was not entirely consistent, defendant was not prejudiced by his counsel's not interviewing a previous forensic interviewer or another individual the victim had mistaken for defendant. The information would have been cumulative. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Pirtle, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: A-23-230, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Ebel finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant of sexual abuse against a minor. Defendant claims on appeal that the lower court improperly allowed a 50-minute video recording of a forensic interview with the child victim, which defendant says violated the rules regarding hearsay. The interview in question, however, was supported by "sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness" and had enough value to the proceedings to outweigh any evidence-related issues. Affirmed.
Court: 10th Circuit, Judge: Ebel, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 22-7033, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Alley finds a lower court erred in granting a defendant’s motion to suppress his confession to sexually abusing his daughter. While defendant referenced that he would get a lawyer while being questioned by detectives, he continued to speak to them regardless, and as he “was not in custody and was free to terminate the interrogation,” his confession should not have been suppressed. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Alley, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00077-CR, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Gremillion finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant to 25 years in prison for one count of third-degree rape, two counts of indecent behavior with a juvenile and one count of pornography involving a juvenile. Defendant's sentence was not excessive because he consistently targeted girls between the ages of 13 and 16 to get them drunk and perform sexual acts with them. He entered his guilty plea knowing that it waived his right to appeal his convictions. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Gremillion, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: KA-23-621, Categories: Sentencing, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Virden finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for sexual assault and rape committed against his minor grandchildren based on sufficient evidence. The children testified the abuse, including vaginal and oral penetration, seemed like normal life. Defendant told one of the children that if she told anyone she would be committed to a mental institution, also threatening to hurt her pets. Witness credibility was properly considered, and the court properly elected to run the sentences consecutively. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Virden , Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: CR-23-581, Categories: Sentencing, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Egan finds the trial court properly convicted defendant, after a jury trial, for 30 sexual offenses committed against his stepson. “Because the jury heard evidence of other crimes, the prosecutor had reason to ensure that the jury found defendant guilty on each count based on the evidence that corresponded with each charge.” Affirmed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Egan, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: A177520, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Stewart finds the district court properly dismissed the Texas inmate's second-in-time petition for lack of jurisdiction. Convicted for continuous sexual abuse, indecency with a child and sexual contact, and possession of child porn, the inmate says that though his first-in-time petition was still pending on appeal when his second-in-time habeas petition was filed, the second filing should have been construed as a motion to amend. Consistent with statutory and Supreme Court guidance, the inmate's second-in-time petition was successive, and subject to the court’s transfer order for lack of jurisdiction absent authorization to file. Affirmed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Stewart , Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 21-11031, Categories: Habeas, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Soto finds a lower court did not err in convicting defendant of continuous sexual abuse of a child. Defendant raised a number of purported issues with his conviction, including disputing evidentiary rulings made by the court, and while the lower court did indeed err by allowing the victim’s mother and two detectives to testify as outcry witnesses based on discrepancies in their testimonies, the errors “did not have a substantial and injurious effect” given the overall evidence against defendant. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Soto, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00162-CR, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Musseman finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for lewd or indecent proposals to a child under 16 based on sufficient evidence. The jury's 5-year sentence was within the statutory range and the sentencing judge imposed the assessed sentence. Defendant raised no objection during sentencing. Though defendant made only proposals to the child, he is equally legally culpable as one having committed the act of sexual molestation. Affirmed.
Court: Oklahoma Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Musseman, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: F-2022-787, Categories: Sentencing, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Ahlers finds that the lower court properly prevented defense counsel from introducing evidence about defendant's agreement to be interviewed by police in his trial for sexually abusing a child because the state would have been entitled to provide evidence that risked significant prejudice during rebuttal. Affirmed.
Court: Iowa Court Of Appeals, Judge: Ahlers, Filed On: April 10, 2024, Case #: 22-1593, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Miller finds that the trial court properly convicted defendant of aggravated child molestation and child molestation. Sufficient evidence was presented to support defendant's convictions, including defendant's own admission to his wife that he had sex with one victim. The trial court correctly denied defendant's motion for a new trial. Defendant failed to vigorously assert his right to appeal and cannot show that he was prejudiced by the 20-year delay between his convictions and the resolution of his motion for a new trial. Three pro se filings made by defendant between 2005 and 2009 did not specifically claim that his due process rights were violated by the delay. Defendant did not first assert a due process violation until 2022. Affirmed.
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals, Judge: Miller, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: A24A0344, Categories: sex Offender, Due Process, child Victims
J. O'Brien finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant of Class X predatory criminal sexual assault of a child. The two charges on which he was convicted do not contain identical elements because a person can commit aggravated sexual assault of a child without also committing the offense of predatory criminal sexual assault of a child. Affirmed.
Court: Illinois Supreme Court, Judge: O'Brien, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 129425, Categories: Sentencing, sex Offender, child Victims
J. MacDonald opposes the defendant’s challenge of one of his convictions of a pattern of aggravated felonious sexual assault, which alleged that he repeatedly touched the breasts of the victim, who was under 13 years old. While chest isn't always a synonym for breasts, and the victim said the defendant touched her “chest” rather than “breasts,” she said that his touching of her became inappropriate when he touched her chest.
Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court, Judge: MacDonald, Filed On: April 3, 2024, Case #: 2022-0563, Categories: sex Offender, Assault, child Victims
J. Bishop finds the trial court properly convicted defendant, by no-contest plea, for sexual assault of a child. Forensic interview and testimony provided by the victims support the convictions. Though defendant says statements given by the parents of the victims were improperly allowed, the statutory definition of a victim establishes a baseline right to provide victim impact statements, and it does not limit a sentencing court’s discretion to consider relevant evidence from a variety of sources. All sentencing factors were properly considered. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Bishop , Filed On: April 2, 2024, Case #: A-23-522, Categories: Sentencing, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Brennan reverses the dismissal of indictments against the defendant for attempted rape of a child, attempted indecent assault and battery on a child under 14 and attempted indecent assault and battery on a person 14 or older. Even though he didn’t touch his 13-year-old daughter, he instructed her to masturbate with him on the phone with her.
Court: Massachusetts Court Of Appeals, Judge: Brennan, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: 23-P-37, Categories: sex Offender, Assault, child Victims
J. Garry finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant based on his guilty plea to criminal sexual act against two children. Defendant sought to withdraw his plea on grounds of duress, but during the plea colloquy he denied being threatened or coerced into pleading guilty. Affirmed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Garry, Filed On: March 28, 2024, Case #: 111551, Categories: sex Offender, Plea, child Victims
J. Hoyle finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for three counts of aggravated assault of a child, sentencing him to life in prison. Defendant makes no argument the denial of his motion for continuance would have been error. His belief the mother’s lack of testimony is the reason for the hung jury at first trial is speculation. The record indicates defendant was able to present his defensive positions the victim fabricated the sexual assault claim and that the house was under construction, thereby undermining the victim’s account. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Hoyle , Filed On: March 28, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00119-CR, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Brown finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for raping his girlfriend's daughter. The victim said she was 10 years old when she first made accusations against him, but she later recanted and was returned home after defendant pressured her. Her aunt then read diary entries detailing events of rape, as well as defendant's having bought her a sex toy. Contrary to defendant's argument, the state is not required to prove specifically when and where each act occurred. Furthermore, certain testimony detailing events that occurred outside Arkansas were properly admitted under the pedophile exception. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Brown , Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: CR-23-387, Categories: Evidence, sex Offender, child Victims
J. Dorrian finds defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel regarding the filing of a notice of alibi prior to his trial on rape charges is contradicted by the record, which shows his attorney filed the notice more than six months before trial; therefore, the claim is meritless. Meanwhile, the trial court properly denied defendant's motion for acquittal because the victim's testimony established all the elements of the offenses with which he was charged and was sufficient to prove the assaults. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Dorrian, Filed On: March 26, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1139, Categories: Ineffective Assistance, sex Offender, child Victims